| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Date: | 2008-04-01 14:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1452.1207058761@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Was the driver ever changed to take advantage of the above strategy?
Well, it's automatic as long as you use the unnamed statement. About
all that might need to be done on the client side is to use unnamed
statements more often in preference to named ones, and I believe that
something like that did get done in JDBC.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Morris Goldstein | 2008-04-01 14:12:15 | Re: Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-01 13:59:35 | Re: build multiple indexes in single table pass? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2008-04-01 14:21:34 | Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-04-01 11:14:34 | Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work |