| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2010-08-18 22:06:32 |
| Message-ID: | 14480.1282169192@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> I don't really think that pg_upgrade should be recommended for 8.3 to
>>> 8.4 upgrades. There are too many limitations and it's not been well
>>> tested. I don't even trust it very much yet for 8.4 to 9.0 updates...
> It's actually pretty well tested for to 9.0. A lot of the beta-testers
> have been using it.
Well, I think it's now approaching releaseable quality for 8.4->9.0.
What I was objecting to was recommending the previous iteration with
any enthusiasm ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-19 01:27:54 | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-18 21:25:45 | Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade |