Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-10-08 14:10:23
Message-ID: 1444313423196-5869289.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sawada Masahiko wrote:
>
> I agree with adding support for multi-line GUC parameters.
> But I though it is:
> param = 'param1,
> param2,
> param3'
>
> This reads as 'value1,value2,value3'.

Use of '\' ensures that omission the closing quote does not break the entire
file.

-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5869289.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amir Rohan 2015-10-08 14:28:06 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2015-10-08 14:05:37 Re: RLS bug in expanding security quals