| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | colin(at)field(dot)medicine(dot)adelaide(dot)edu(dot)au |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] New asynchronous tcl postgresql interface |
| Date: | 1999-07-23 14:05:36 |
| Message-ID: | 14431.932738736@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Colin McCormack <colin(at)field(dot)medicine(dot)adelaide(dot)edu(dot)au> writes:
> I think this is possibly a better alternative to the shipped tcl interface.
> A quick/experimental Swig-generated hack
> with itcl wrapper classes to permit:
> - asynchronous execution of postgresql commands,
> - cancellation of commands in progress.
Cool. The existing libpgtcl is certainly lacking in those areas
(although it does have pretty good asynchronous-NOTIFY support,
which I hope you borrowed).
Are you planning to bring this code & doc up to the level at which
it could become part of the standard distribution?
Since your code requires itcl and the existing library doesn't,
I foresee that not everyone will want to switch. It might be good
to choose a name that will make it clear that this code needs itcl
(I'm thinking libpgitcl, perhaps) so that people will easily see
which is which.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Bettis | 1999-07-23 14:25:53 | Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql + lo |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-23 13:57:30 | Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql + lo |