| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dump comments on large objects in text mode |
| Date: | 2005-06-30 04:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | 14424.1120104320@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> we can possibly gain custom format full cluster dumps.
Do we care? The main rationale for inventing a custom format, as I
recall it, was (a) plain text couldn't hack blobs and (b) you needed
the ability to rearrange the dump order to work around pg_dump's lack
of understanding of dependencies. (a) is a dead letter now and (b)
is much less compelling than it once was.
The custom format is still interesting in that it provides the option
to do selective reload --- but if that's what you want, dumping a
database at a time doesn't seem like a terrible restriction.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-06-30 04:11:30 | Re: Dump comments on large objects in text mode |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-30 04:03:12 | Re: Autovacuum integration patch |