Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command
> returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT"
> instead? As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT
> (without a space) in user-visible messages, right?
The command tag should match the actual command. If the command name
is "ALTER LARGE OBJECT", the command tag should be too. This is
independent of phraseology we might choose in error messages (though
I agree I don't like "largeobject" in those either).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-01-28 15:32:33|
|Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate|
|Previous:||From: Tim Bunce||Date: 2010-01-28 15:30:27|
|Subject: Re: plperl compiler warning|