Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Mark Aufflick <mark(at)pumptheory(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Date: 2005-02-15 17:55:19
Message-ID: 14042.1108490119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Why is mmap not workable?

We can't control write order. There are other equally bad problems,
but that one alone eliminates it from consideration. See past discussions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2005-02-15 18:03:53 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-02-15 17:22:59 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown