| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
| Date: | 2010-03-03 06:12:16 |
| Message-ID: | 13870.1267596736@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the
>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax.
> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches?
What's to fix? The documentation already makes it quite clear where
you're supposed to put the label. I think documenting the code's
actual behavior could only confuse people.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-03-03 06:37:30 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-03-03 06:07:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-03-03 06:37:30 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-03-03 06:07:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |