| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance mention |
| Date: | 2009-04-13 06:04:18 |
| Message-ID: | 13783.1239602658@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian escreveu:
>> Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1
>> didn't reference child tables by default?
>>
> No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported releases from documentation.
"Unsupported releases" is far too strict a criterion for this. For
example, there are demonstrably still people using 7.2 (we had a
question about it just last week). They will still appreciate these
notes when they get around to updating.
Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really
saving? Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-04-13 16:47:32 | Re: Inheritance mention |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2009-04-13 05:14:53 | Re: Inheritance mention |