Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union
Date: 1998-07-07 22:27:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Aww.  Hackers is a great name.  Devel might be more appropriate, but
hackers isn't so bad.

On Tue, 7 July 1998, at 14:47:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yea, that is on my list too.  One of us will have it fixed for 6.4.  The
> rest sounds good to me.  I am not particularly happy with 'hackers' name
> either.
> -- 
> Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-07-07 22:46:16
Subject: Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-07-07 22:01:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group