Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union
Date: 1998-07-07 22:27:43
Message-ID: 13730.41183.877359.211335@web0.speakeasy.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Aww. Hackers is a great name. Devel might be more appropriate, but
hackers isn't so bad.

On Tue, 7 July 1998, at 14:47:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yea, that is on my list too. One of us will have it fixed for 6.4. The
> rest sounds good to me. I am not particularly happy with 'hackers' name
> either.
>
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-07-07 22:46:16 Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-07 22:01:27 Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend?