Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it? Might be worth diffing a make
>> distclean'd tree against a virgin one.
> I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a
> configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps should do it
> too.
No, it's not the source code file he's complaining about.
regards, tom lane