| From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | some more rambling on the new fe/be communication |
| Date: | 1998-06-01 16:08:09 |
| Message-ID: | 13682.53737.127615.544855@web0.speakeasy.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
it would appear that libpq now has a outgoing data buffer associated
with PGconn struct which only gets sent (with send()!?) when pqFlush
gets called. the backend still appears to use and pass FILE * for
reading and writing. I wasn't aware that you can read data from a
FILE * sent with send() over a socket. Is this portable? Time to
pull out stevens.
In any case, I don't think this bodes well for my SSL patch -- and I
think I've missed something -- why have we switched to send/recv? I
assume for the synchronous notification? I haven't been following
that discussion as much as I possibly could be, so I'll look in the
archives. Anyway, this is sort of a plea for help -- I'm totally
confused, so if there's just something I'm missing, please let me
know.
Does anyone know what implications the new communication scheme has
for SSL? I know this isn't a postgresql priority, but it is an
interest of mine. Is it still possible? I'll start doing my
homework.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jose' Soares Da Silva | 1998-06-01 17:42:26 | Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |
| Previous Message | AliE | 1998-06-01 15:58:04 | unsubscribe |