Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: fork/exec

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fork/exec
Date: 2003-11-28 21:33:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Oh, good.  I couldn't remember if it was the postmaster or child that
> validates that key.  I now remember only the postmaster needs the secret
> because it sends the signal.

However, the child process needs the secret for long enough to send it
off to the client at the completion of the authentication handshake.
So there is a problem to resolve here.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-28 21:42:10
Subject: Re: fork/exec
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-11-28 21:24:22
Subject: Re: fork/exec

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group