From: | henk53602(at)hotmail(dot)com (henk53) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Replicating JDBC proxy |
Date: | 2004-05-14 12:38:07 |
Message-ID: | 135a85f7.0405140438.7837b73c@posting.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I would like to have a constantly updated copy of my DB. In order to
realize this I have though of the following scheme:
A server is equiped with 3 NICs and is running a special 'proxy' JDBC
implementation.
The only thing this JDBC proxy does is:
1) Forwarding every update request on both ports. On each port a
server is running a JDBC compliant DB (in my case, postgresql)
2) Forwarding every select request on only 1 port.
Theoretically, this would give me a total synchronized DB, wouldn't
it? However, this sounds relative simple to implement. I've seen a
couple of replication efforts undertaken for postgresql that seems to
take forever to finish.
Am I overlooking something?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian S. Nelson | 2004-05-14 16:58:25 | Timeouts on big queries with JDBC? |
Previous Message | Katalina Marcos | 2004-05-13 16:04:51 | charset property is not working |