Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-10 16:20:17
Message-ID: 13586.1105374017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all
> feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt. I have not heard anyone say
> *.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote?

AFAIR they both said they didn't care; you are the only one who is
exercised about this.

I don't particularly care either, but I do note that Peter already
generated what was supposed to be the final version of the man pages,
and we can't change this without changing those.

Do what you want; I have more important problems to worry about right now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2005-01-10 16:20:35 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-10 16:09:58 "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-01-10 17:17:12 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-01-10 15:39:36 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..