Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] PL/Python: Add spidata to all spiexceptions

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PL/Python: Add spidata to all spiexceptions
Date: 2013-01-09 19:29:37
Message-ID: 1357759777.6287.4@mofo (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/09/2013 01:08:39 PM, Jan Urbański wrote:

> > I can see arguments to be made for both sides.  I'm asking that you
> > think it through to the extent you deem necessary and make
> > changes or not.  At that point it should be ready to send
> > to a committer.  (I'll re-test first, if you make any changes.)
> Oh my, I have dropped the ball on this one in the worst manner
> possible. 
> Sorry!

My fault too.  I've been thinking I should write to remind you.

> I actually still prefer to keep the signatures of
> PLy_get_spi_sqlerrcode 
> and PLy_get_spi_error_data similar, so I'd opt for keeping the patch 
> as-is :)

I will send it on to a committer.


Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-09 19:32:59
Subject: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Previous:From: anarazel@anarazel.deDate: 2013-01-09 19:20:35
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group