Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
Cc: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INT2OID, etc.
Date: 1998-02-27 06:20:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Can we have all the constants put in pg_type?  In the implementation
of my perl PL language, some types I care about aren't defined so I
must define them myself, which seems dangerous (should they ever

On Fri, 27 February 1998, at 12:15:21, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:

> I like second way (and so - we should copy pg_type to ~pgsql/include or
> something like this) but it would be nice if you support more
> general 1st way too.
> Vadim

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim B. MikheevDate: 1998-02-27 07:13:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INT2OID, etc.
Previous:From: Brett McCormickDate: 1998-02-27 06:18:11
Subject: money_words_out segfaults

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group