grammer/keywords/shift/reduce conflicts

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: grammer/keywords/shift/reduce conflicts
Date: 1998-02-26 04:14:43
Message-ID: 13556.60359.241395.858167@abraxas.scene.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


well, by putting TRANSACTION and ORDER in the ColID grammer, I seem to
have introduced some shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts.. will
the grammer work? What are your thoughts on using these as column
identifiers? If they aren't going to end up usable I certainly won't
use them as table/field names.. (order sounds like a really bad idea)

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-26 05:39:10 Re: [HACKERS] mode of libs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-26 04:13:18 Re: [HACKERS] mode of libs