|From:||Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>|
|To:||Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: gistchoose vs. bloat|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 01:03 +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> I notice there's no documentation about the new reloption at
> Thanks for notice! I've added small description to docs in the
> attached patch.
Here is an edited version of the documentation note. Please review to
see if you like my version.
Also, I fixed a compiler warning.
My tests showed a significant reduction in the size of a gist index with
many of the same penalty values. The run times showed mixed results,
however, and I didn't dig in much further because you've already done
Marking this one ready again.
|Next Message||Kyotaro HORIGUCHI||2012-12-14 09:02:07||Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation|
|Previous Message||Jeff Davis||2012-12-14 08:04:45||Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids|