Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c
Date: 2012-09-27 18:06:34
Message-ID: 1348769194.32133.14@mofo (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 09/27/2012 11:02:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Rather, the problem is that the server might know about some newer
> lexical feature, and so might the application, but if libpq is behind
> the times then it's broken. 

If the application knows about the newer feature and wants
to use it, is it unreasonable to ask the application
be linked against a newer libpq?

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-09-27 18:34:16
Subject: Re: Oid registry
Previous:From: Karl O. PincDate: 2012-09-27 18:02:14
Subject: Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group