Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: User functions and AIX

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User functions and AIX
Date: 2001-05-28 17:21:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
> The top of the backtrace looks like this.

> #0  0x0 in ?? () from (unknown load module)
> #1  0xd1087a60 in chkpass_in (fcinfo=0x0) at chkpass.c:88
> #2  0x10045cf4 in or_clause (clause=0x0) at clauses.c:211
> #3  0x10075d68 in int82ge (fcinfo=0x1015cfc8) at int8.c:343
> #4  0x1005909c in _readArrayRef () at readfuncs.c:924
> #5  0x10059b68 in _readSeqScan () at readfuncs.c:600

I don't believe a word of that backtrace, and neither should you.
The alleged call arcs at levels below #1 do not exist in the code.
Ergo, I doubt the top two levels can be trusted either.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2001-05-28 17:41:40
Subject: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Previous:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 2001-05-28 17:15:17
Subject: Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group