Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-26 20:29:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
> Robert, all:
> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition.  Is there anything
> keeping this from going into 9.3?  It would eliminate a major
> configuration headache for our users.

I don't think that patch was all that reasonable.  It needed work, and
in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kohei KaiGaiDate: 2012-06-26 20:36:15
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-06-26 20:08:48
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group