| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Date: | 2012-06-18 18:52:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1340045545.19023.50.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 21:34 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2012-06-18 at 18:05 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > - defaulting to initdb -N in the regression suite is not a good imo,
> > because that way the buildfarm won't catch problems in that area...
> >
> The regression test suite also starts postgres with fsync off. This is
> good, and I don't want to have more overhead in the tests. It's not
> like we already have awesome test coverage for OS interaction.
OK, changing back to using -N during regression tests due to performance
concerns.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| initdb-fsync-20120618-2.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 4.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-18 18:57:51 | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-18 18:45:53 | Re: WAL format changes |