Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
Date: 2012-06-15 23:24:30
Message-ID: 1339802670.20206.3.camel@sussancws0025
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 12:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hmmm. I think we should also say "partitioning", as well as
> "inheritance". Maybe:
>
> "Extensive use of table inheritance, such as for tables with many
> partitions, may require raising this setting."

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-CONSTRAINT-EXCLUSION

Looks like we do define it, so that's fine with me.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-06-19 21:16:41 Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-06-15 19:37:03 Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction