Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
Date: 2012-06-15 19:25:14
Message-ID: 1339788314.16772.3.camel@sussancws0025 (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> The default, 64, has historically proven sufficient for most databases,
> but you might need to raise this value if you have clients that touch
> many different tables in a single transaction.  Databases with several
> tables with many partitions each can require raising this setting.

Is "partition" defined somewhere else in the docs?

Maybe it should say something like: "Extensive use of table inheritance
is the most common reason to increase this value from the default",
assuming that's what you meant.

	Jeff Davis

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-06-15 19:37:03
Subject: Re: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-06-15 18:05:30
Subject: Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group