On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:03 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 10:53 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > >> Tom is intending to wrap a PG 9.2b2 tarball tomorrow for release next
> > >> week. I'd therefore like to release a pgAdmin beta at the same time.
> > >> I'll aim to build tomorrow afternoon UK time, unless there are any
> > >> objections.
> > >>
> > >
> > > No objection. Will you have the time to build the installers this time?
> > Hopefully. Though, the PG installers will probably come next week -
> > building and QAing 5 branches in 1 day is just too much. That means
> > the pgAdmin installers will follow.
> Hmmm, kinda worried you don't talk about 1.14.3. It would be good to
> release this version (we have 25 fixes in this yet-to-be-released
> I know it's a lot of work, but will you get 1.14.3 out at the same time?
With the recent pushs, I have my answer :)
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2012-05-31 14:07:03|
|Subject: Re: 1.16 beta 2?|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2012-05-31 13:45:18|
|Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Tag REL-1_16_0-BETA2 has been created.|