Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John DeSoi <jd(at)icx(dot)net>
Cc: Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk>,pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4
Date: 2003-10-29 05:07:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
John DeSoi <jd(at)icx(dot)net> writes:
> What version of OS X are you running? I thought I replicated the 
> problem after upgrading to 10.2.8, but now I'm not certain I ran initdb 
> again (I may have just rebuilt beta 5). So possibly it could be a 
> difference between 10.2.6 and 10.2.8. If not, I have no clue. I'll 
> report back if I find anything.

I'm running 10.2.6 (a pretty fresh install, see prior bellyaching about
hardware problems with my laptop ;-)).  IIRC, someone else reported
success with a clean 10.2.8 installation in this thread.  I have also
checked PG against a 10.3 beta recently, and so have other people.
It's fairly likely that there are problems with 10.1, if anyone still
uses that, but I have no reason to think that PG 7.4 will fail with
either 10.2.* or 10.3.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alessio BragadiniDate: 2003-10-29 11:45:42
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-29 04:17:11
Subject: Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: ruhunu GamaralaDate: 2003-10-29 09:05:51
Subject: org.postgresql.PG_Stream.flush(
Previous:From: AlekseyDate: 2003-10-29 03:05:55
Subject: JDBC DatabaseMetaData problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group