| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | amador alvarez <aalvarez(at)d2(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: clustering with shared storage |
| Date: | 2012-03-20 20:53:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1332276825.23452.6.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:33 -0700, amador alvarez wrote:
> I wonder why are you considering this solution
* Automatic failover detection
* No replication overhead, in case you don't need it.
RHCS+PostgreSQL can also be used when you shard your data to multiple
databases, and use each server as "active" server, like I told in the
25th slide of the presentation that I just in the previous email.
So, RHCS and SR/HS are not competitive to each other. We have installed
them in parallel several times, like to 3 servers.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2012-03-20 20:55:02 | Re: clustering with shared storage |
| Previous Message | amador alvarez | 2012-03-20 20:33:13 | Re: clustering with shared storage |