From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
Date: | 2012-03-13 14:34:16 |
Message-ID: | 1331649152-sup-3424@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar mar 13 11:14:43 -0300 2012:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:33:09AM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > To answer your specific question, I think clearing the last analyzed
> > > fields should cause autovacuum to run on analyze those tables. What I
> > > don't know is whether not clearing the last vacuum datetime will cause
> > > the table not to be analyzed.
> >
> > Thank you very much for this reference. I will look into it.
>
> I assume a missing last_analyze would trigger an auto-analyze,
You're wrong. Autovacuum does not consider time, only dead/live tuple
counts. The formulas it uses are in the autovacuum docs; some details
(such as the fact that it skips tables that do not have stat entries)
might be missing.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-03-13 14:49:26 | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-03-13 14:28:58 | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |