Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: leakproof

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-26 12:53:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2012-02-24 at 23:00 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> I also liked Kevin's suggestion of DISCREET

That would probably create too much confusion with "discrete".

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-02-26 13:41:32
Subject: Re: Triggers with DO functionality
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-02-26 12:34:59
Subject: Re: ISO8601 nitpicking

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group