Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2012-02-24 22:31:47
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead?  We already have several
${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
having to guess variant spellings.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2012-02-24 22:32:35
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-02-24 22:27:06
Subject: Re: Checking pg_hba.conf in the child process

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group