Re: Why Index is not working on date columns.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kishore B <kishorebh(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why Index is not working on date columns.
Date: 2005-10-25 13:38:35
Message-ID: 13279.1130247515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Kishore B <kishorebh(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Can you guys please take a look at the following query and let me know why
> the index is not considered in the plan?

"Considered" and "used" are two different things.

The two examples you give have the same estimated cost (within two
decimal places) so the planner sees no particular reason to choose one
over the other.

I surmise that you are testing on toy tables and extrapolating to what
will happen on larger tables. This is an unjustified assumption.
Create a realistic test data set, ANALYZE it, and then see if the
planner chooses indexes you like.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wollny 2005-10-25 13:39:42 Re: Strange planner decision on quite simple select
Previous Message Rich Doughty 2005-10-25 11:35:06 Outer join query plans and performance