| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-09-10 19:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1315684218.1296.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2011-09-06 at 13:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> 2011/9/6 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> > Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> >> Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
> >
> > We talked about it on core and no one seems interested in doing the
> > packaging. :-(
>
> Well I don't particularly mind pushing a tag and bundling it, but I
> guess the question is whether we actually want to do alpha releases at
> all. I assume that core's reluctance to do this stems from being
> dubious about its value, which seems like something that we should
> discuss more broadly.
One point, which was already raised last year around this time, was that
it does seem weird to have alphas for release N+1 while beta for release
N is still going on. This year the start of N+1 was even earlier than
last year.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-09-10 19:52:29 | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-09-10 19:44:16 | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |