Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE
Date: 2011-08-03 03:53:12
Message-ID: 1312343425-sup-9110@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar ago 02 22:46:55 -0400 2011:

> I have created a documentation patch to clarify this, and to mention
> CREATE TABLE AS which also has this optimization.

It doesn't seem particularly better to me. How about something like

In minimal level, WAL-logging of some operations can be safely skipped,
which can make those operations much faster (see <blah>). Operations on
which this optimization can be applied include:
<simplelist>
<item>CREATE INDEX</item>
<item>CLUSTER</item>
<item>CREATE TABLE AS</item>
<item>COPY, when tables that were created or truncated in the same
transaction
</simplelist>

Minimal WAL does not contain enough information to reconstruct the data
from a base backup and the WAL logs, so either <literal>archive</> or
<literal>hot_standby</> level must be used to enable ...

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2011-08-03 07:11:32 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-08-03 03:40:53 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints