| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works |
| Date: | 2018-09-26 23:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 13115.1538003570@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Oh, come on. One can be disabled with a GUC, has (although not good
> enough) intelligence when it switches on, the other has ... none of
> that. Obviously performance is always a balancing act, but you'd be
> pretty pissed at anybody else regressing performance in a non-fringe
> case, and then refused responsibility. And as I said, I'm willing to
> help.
Well, fine, let's work on it. Did you note Alexander's comparison to
some "stb" library in the other thread? I wonder if we could borrow
code or at least ideas from that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-09-26 23:13:31 | Re: Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-26 23:10:40 | Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already |