On tor, 2011-06-23 at 10:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we agree to make that credit goal overt, there is then little logic
> to avoid company names in the release notes, except it is more overt
> than it is now. It is then a question of the level of credit given
> --- there is no logical prohibition.
I think we'd do both the readers of the actual release notes and those
who want to be credited a service if we separated those lists anyway.
We could just have a list of names after the change list, "The following
contributed to this release" or something like that.
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2011-06-25 09:46:01|
|Subject: is there any policy on event sponsors?|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-06-23 14:59:10|
|Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in
the release notes|