Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-15 11:01:31
Message-ID: 1308135691.1993.45.camel@laptop (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:57, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >>> We don't have both. We currently have a pgAdmin which supports
> >>> everything back to 7.3.
> >>
> >> No we don't. We have a pgAdmin, which it says on the website supports
> >> back to 7.3. I know I haven't run anything older than 8.0 for *years*,
> >> and certainly the QA guys at EDB don't. I don't believe Erwin does
> >> either. Therefore I don't believe we can honestly say we support back
> >> to 7.3.
> >
> > Didn't we at some point say it's reasonable to support as far back as
> > the pg community support postgresql, which would mean 8.2 at this
> > point?
> Yes, I'm pretty sure we did. And in fact, from pgAdmin3.h:
> // Supported server minimum and maximum values.
> const short SERVER_MIN_VERSION_N = 0x0802;
> const wxString SERVER_MIN_VERSION_T = wxT("8.2");
> const short SERVER_MAX_VERSION_N = 0x0901;
> const wxString SERVER_MAX_VERSION_T = wxT("9.1");

Yes, and I'm OK with this.

> > As long as we keep the downloads for the older versions around, people
> > who are running an unsupported version of postgresql should be ok
> > running an unsupported version of pgadmin,no?
> Right.
> I think what Guillaume is suggesting though is not that we keep saying
> 7.3 is supported, but that we don't remove code that's there to
> support older versions than we don't currently support.

Exactly my point.

>  On the other
> hand, I'm saying we're not actively doing that, but if someone wants
> to do so, or if we want to simplify things when working on a
> particular piece of code, then removing the support for older versions
> is acceptable.

OK, let's put it another way. I don't support removing old code whose
only fault is to support older, even unsupported, PostgreSQL release. I
won't do any review of a patch whose sole purpose is to drop some code
that was interesting for support of old releases. And I won't
commit/push them.


In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-06-15 11:06:14
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-15 10:27:48
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group