| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Branch 1.14? |
| Date: | 2011-06-15 09:09:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1308128975.1993.35.camel@laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:00 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> You're right. Patching very old releases will become more difficult.
> But those patches are rare and most of the time not very large, so the
> merge should not be a big problem.
I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean that users will have to backpatch
some bugfixes and compile an old pgAdmin to be able to use old
PostgreSQL releases? I sincerely hope you don't mean that.
> Either one actual version of pgAdmin which supports everything back to
> 7.3. or different versions which targets different postgresql
> releases. Currently we have a hybrid - that's not very good, I think.
We don't have both. We currently have a pgAdmin which supports
everything back to 7.3. And you cannot say otherwise, unless you know
some bugs you didn't report.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-15 09:57:04 | Re: Branch 1.14? |
| Previous Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-06-15 08:00:37 | Re: Branch 1.14? |