| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Branch 1.14? |
| Date: | 2011-06-15 05:57:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1308117473.1993.3.camel@laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 23:41 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> We don't tend to remove the old code as that can lead to painful
> amounts of refactoring to make things look right afterwards. If you
> feel so inclined though, go ahead and do some cleanup.
>
I don't see why we should remove old code that still works. That we say
we don't "officially" support older versions than 8.2, that's one thing
I would understand. Working on dropping code that should work to make
sure no one can use it with older versions is something I can't
understand.
So, -1 for dropping any code, unless we have proof it contains a bug we
don't want to fix because it's on some old unsupported PostgreSQL
release.
(and when I say "-1", I really want to say "-1000000").
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-15 06:00:40 | pgAdmin III commit: Update french translation |
| Previous Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-06-14 23:03:58 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |