Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 18:05:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:

> > Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
> > and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
> > with them and what else would you suggest?
> Just FYI, CMD uses redmine and so far it is the best we have found. It 
> isn't perfect certainly but overall it does a nice job. It supports 
> email integration as well as plugins (we have even written a couple).

I certainly wouldn't suggest that Redmine wouldn't cause a change in
workflow though.

> Alvaro has also brought up the system that Debian uses which is actually 
> email based versus web based.

Yeah, that's debbugs, which has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-31 18:13:43
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous:From: Ross J. ReedstromDate: 2011-05-31 18:02:04
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group