Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 18:05:45
Message-ID: 1306865082-sup-5139@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:

> > Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
> > and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
> > with them and what else would you suggest?
>
> Just FYI, CMD uses redmine and so far it is the best we have found. It
> isn't perfect certainly but overall it does a nice job. It supports
> email integration as well as plugins (we have even written a couple).

I certainly wouldn't suggest that Redmine wouldn't cause a change in
workflow though.

> Alvaro has also brought up the system that Debian uses which is actually
> email based versus web based.

Yeah, that's debbugs, which has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-31 18:13:43 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2011-05-31 18:02:04 Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID