Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 17:37:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 14:58 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> But sure, it can probably be improved. But what people are then
> basically asying is that tsearch isn't good enough for searching.

For one thing, there should be more structured search possibilities,
such as by date or author or subject only etc.  Nothing that tsearch has
anything to do with.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-05-31 17:43:48
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID
Previous:From: Rikard PavelicDate: 2011-05-31 17:28:27
Subject: BUG #6046: select current_date crashes postgres

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group