| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
| Date: | 2011-05-31 13:19:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1306847963.6396.41.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 08:44 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
> >
>
> I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
> at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
> the archives.
To some degree, the lack of a good search for the archives is half the
problem. Not that a better search would be a replacement for a bug
tracker, but it would go a long way.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-31 13:22:52 | Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-31 13:07:50 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |