Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 16:23:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:48 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > I need to figure out what to do with pg_filedump.  All I need for it
> > is an SCM and someplace to put release tarballs.  I'd prefer to use
> >, but if there's nowhere for tarballs, that's not
> > going to work.
> Hmm, that's a good example. It would certainly qualify to live on
> using the criteria I have in mind, but I can see
> the tarballs would be an issue. If we do keep for
> trusted projects, then perhaps it wouldn't be such an issue to give
> certain users from each one access to a server to upload tarballs into
> the mirror network.
> I certainly wouldn't want to offer that to every project on pgFoundry
> though.

We already allow *everyone* to distribute their tarballs through our FTP
mirror network. 
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB:
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community:,  Twitter:

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-05-20 17:03:55
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-20 16:21:03
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group