| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rainer Pruy <rainer(dot)pruy(at)acrys(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |
| Date: | 2011-03-28 14:05:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1301321082-sup-1641@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Rainer, any idea? Please see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D906269.6060109@commandprompt.com
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 11:03:16 -0300 2011:
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 07:26:49 -0300 2011:
> > Likely "too large" is more an issue related to available resources than
> > of absolute figure.
> >
> > On a penta byte of free storage I would not mind allocating some teras
> > with extending a (large) table.
> > If I'm left with some MB only, I'd be concerned for sure.
>
> ...
>
> Does anybody have an idea just W-T-F happened here? I did NOT send the
> above email (as evidenced by it being signed by "Rainer"). I notice it
> even has a "@commandprompt.com" message-id. Should I start signing my
> email?
>
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rainer Pruy | 2011-03-28 14:28:54 | Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-03-28 14:03:16 | Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |