From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Nick Rudnick <joerg(dot)rudnick(at)t-online(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases) |
Date: | 2011-02-08 19:26:06 |
Message-ID: | 1297193166.20104.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2011-02-05 at 12:26 +0100, Nick Rudnick wrote:
> o extensions of PostgreSQL to support such a kind of usage have to
> be expected to be expected to be rejected from integration to the code
> base core -- i.e., if they are done, students have to be told «you
> can't expect this to become a part of PostgreSQL»
There are very varied interests in this community. But you have to keep
in mind that PostgreSQL is a production software package, not a research
platform. This doesn't mean that we discourage research with the
PostgreSQL code base. But that should be done in a fork. Code aimed
for inclusion in a proper PostgreSQL release should have demonstrable
real life use and should be developed according to certain standards and
in close corporation with the community. If a research project can deal
with that, great, but typically, research projects are there to
determine whether something could have real-life value in the first
place, and development follows different standards of quality.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-02-08 19:34:15 | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-08 19:25:38 | Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2 |