Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid
Date: 2011-01-03 16:29:19
Message-ID: 1294072159.19612.1452.camel@ebony (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:08 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> It works in read committed mode, because you acquire a new snapshot 
> after the LOCK TABLE, and anyone else who modified the table must commit 
> before the lock is granted. In serializable mode you get a serialization 
> error.

If its not safe without this


then we should do that automatically, and document that.

 Simon Riggs 
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-01-03 16:29:46
Subject: Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-03 16:23:29
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group