| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |
| Date: | 2011-01-03 15:31:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1294068468-sup-4935@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ene 03 12:21:44 -0300 2011:
> Yeah, that's no good. Maybe there's a good way to clear things up
> with an errdetail(), though I'm having a hard time thinking how to
> phrase it.
>
> ERROR: sequence "%s" does not support the requested operation
> DETAIL: Constraints are not supported on sequences.
This seems backwards to me: the "detail" is more general than the main
message.
> ERROR: constraints are not supported on sequences
> DETAIL: "%s" is a sequence.
This one seems good -- the detail message gives the detail.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-03 15:34:58 | Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-03 15:29:36 | Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender |