Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Date: 2010-12-30 13:59:41
Message-ID: 1293717273-sup-5710@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue dic 30 08:57:09 -0300 2010:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 20:12, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> > Some lexer keywords have a _P prefix because otherwise they'd collide
> > with some symbol in Windows header files or something like that.  It's
> > old stuff, but I think you, Magnus, were around at that time.
>
> Heh. That doesn't mean I *remember* it :-)

:-)

> But yes, I see in commit 12c942383296bd626131241c012c2ab81b081738 the
> comment "convert some keywords.c symbols to KEYWORD_P to prevent
> conflict".

Wow, what a mess of a patch ... nowadays this would be like 10 commits
(or so I hope) ... hey, did Bruce sabotage the qnx4 port surreptitiously?

> Based on that, I should probably change it back, right? I just tried a
> patch for it and it compiles and checks just fine with the _P parts
> removed.

Hmm, I wouldn't bother really. It's not that important anyway, IMHO.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-30 14:05:19 Re: Function for dealing with xlog data
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-30 13:31:17 Old git repo