Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-22 22:30:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of lun nov 22 17:17:47 -0300 2010:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 21:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun nov 22 13:29:34 -0300 2010:
> >>> We have nearly ten years of pgsql-committers archives that are now next
> >>> door to useless, because the anoncvs diff links in them are now 404.
> >>> Could we have that service back please?
> >
> >> I wonder if we could handle this in the longer term so that the URL for
> >> each pg-committers message takes you to the gitweb page for that commit.
> >> Probably too much work for not enough gain, I guess.
> >
> > Yeah, probably.  Another difficulty is that our own archives are not the
> > only places those messages are archived.
> >
> > It occurred to me that instead of an actual CVS server, we could
> > possibly have a simple redirector at, which would
> > redirect the diff links to suitable views into the gitweb.  But it's
> > still a lot of work compared to just keeping the old server alive.
> It's certainly going to be a non-trivial amount of work to generate
> that mapping list, no? But if someone wants to generate it, I'll be
> happy to put it in place....

Maybe if the cvs2git conversion had recorded the CVS revisions somewhere
in each commit's metadata, it could be done, but I don't think it does
that.  So it would amount to a second guessing of commit messages vs.
dates.  A lot of work; not for human beings, I fear.

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-23 15:51:08
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-11-22 20:17:47
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group