| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Philip Ives" <phil(at)ivesdigital(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #3295: pg_get_serial_sequence returns wrong sequence name for a serial column |
| Date: | 2007-05-21 23:21:46 |
| Message-ID: | 129.1179789706@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Philip Ives" <phil(at)ivesdigital(dot)com> writes:
> pg_get_serial_sequence doesn't return the correct sequence name and returns
> a null.
Can you provide a reproducible test case for this?
The example you give looks suspiciously like the column was not created
using the SERIAL notation, but through some hand approximation to that.
pg_get_serial_sequence() only works for actual SERIAL columns, because
it looks for a pg_depend entry that's made by SERIAL but not by just
creating a column that happens to involve a nextval() default.
As of 8.2 there's an ALTER SEQUENCE OWNED BY command that you can use
to reproduce this side-effect of SERIAL, but in prior releases there's
no way, unless you're brave enough to insert the pg_depend entry by
hand.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Klint Gore | 2007-05-22 02:40:37 | Re: BUG #3277: error occurs between different versions |
| Previous Message | Philip Ives | 2007-05-21 19:10:34 | BUG #3295: pg_get_serial_sequence returns wrong sequence name for a serial column |